Insurance Carriers & MGAs

Your actuarial and claims data can't touch a cloud API.
Your board thinks you're already using AI.

Ark33 deploys enterprise AI inside your own infrastructure — fully within your perimeter, compliant with NAIC guidance, and documented for state market conduct exams. Your underwriters and claims teams get the productivity your competitors are building. Your compliance team gets something defensible.

Schedule a Compliance Risk Assessment → Free 20-minute call. Brian's honest read on your NAIC exposure. No pitch.

The Regulatory Pressure

The NAIC is paying attention. Your state examiner will ask. Is your answer ready?

State insurance regulators are actively developing guidance on AI use in underwriting, claims, and customer-facing workflows. NAIC model bulletins on AI are already adopted in multiple states. Market conduct exams are beginning to ask about AI governance programs.

Your board is pushing for AI adoption. Your compliance team is blocking every cloud tool that processes policyholder data, loss runs, or actuarial models — because they're right that those tools create exposure. A vendor BAA doesn't resolve the underlying regulatory question of whether that data should leave your perimeter at all.

And underneath all of that: your underwriters are already using AI. Loss run summaries in ChatGPT. Policy language research in Copilot. Nobody approved it. The informal usage gap is exactly where a state examiner finds the finding.

The Solution

AI that runs inside your environment. Documented for the exam.

Ark33 deploys a fine-tuned enterprise AI model on your own AWS or Azure infrastructure. Policyholder data, actuarial models, and claims information never leave your perimeter — not during deployment, not during inference, not ever. We build the governance framework at the same time: audit logs, access controls, model documentation, and the compliance paper trail that answers a state examiner's questions before they're asked.

The Regulatory Momentum

The guidance is already here. Most carriers aren't ready.

2020 NAIC AI Principles Adopted 2022 Model Bulletin on AI in Underwriting 2023 13+ States Adopt or Propose Rules 2024–25 Market Conduct Exams Include AI Questions NOW YOU ARE HERE Examiners asking about AI governance programs today Principles Guidance State Adoption Enforcement Scrutiny SOURCE: NAIC AI WORKING GROUP — GUIDANCE IS JURISDICTION-SPECIFIC. ASSESS YOUR STATE'S CURRENT POSTURE.
What's at Stake

The data your team processes every day.

Every category below is either explicitly covered by state AI guidance, implicated by NAIC model bulletin language, or subject to actuarial standards of practice that govern model governance. A cloud AI vendor's BAA doesn't address any of them.

The Ark33 deployment keeps every one of these inside your own infrastructure. Your compliance team documents it. Your examiner sees a defensible program.

Policyholder & Applicant Data
Personal identifiers, health history, claims history, credit data
NAIC / State
Loss Runs & Claims Files
Incident data, reserve amounts, litigation history, settlement terms
State Exam
Actuarial Models & Rate Filings
Pricing assumptions, credibility factors, ratemaking methodologies
ASOP / PUC
Underwriting Guidelines
Appetite criteria, risk selection rules, classification factors
Proprietary
Reinsurance & Treaty Data
Cession structures, treaty terms, retrocession arrangements
Contractual
Engagement Model

From assessment to running model in 12 weeks.

Phase 01
AI Readiness Assessment
$18,000 · 3 weeks · Credits toward implementation

Infrastructure audit, NAIC and state-specific regulatory gap analysis, model recommendation for your priority use cases, use case prioritization map for underwriting, claims, and document review, and a fixed-price implementation proposal.

Phase 02
Private AI Implementation
$95,000 – $140,000 · Milestone-gated

Enterprise AI model deployed on your VPC, fine-tuned for insurance — policy language, loss run analysis, claims documentation, actuarial research. Governance dashboard, audit logs, and compliance documentation included. Zero external API dependencies after deployment.

Phase 03
Annual Platform License
$48,000 – $72,000 / year

Model updates, security patches, compliance documentation refresh as NAIC guidance evolves, quarterly audit package. We run it. Your compliance posture stays current as the regulatory landscape changes.

Use Cases

What your team can do with private AI.

Underwriting

Loss run summarization, risk factor analysis, policy comparison, appetite matching. Underwriters move faster without sending policyholder data to a cloud API.

Claims

First notice of loss triage, coverage analysis, documentation review, reserve reasoning. Claims staff work more consistently without the regulatory exposure.

Actuarial Research

Literature review, regulatory change monitoring, assumption documentation. Your actuaries spend less time on research and more time on judgment.

Compliance & Legal

Policy language review, regulatory change tracking, exam preparation documentation. Your compliance team uses AI to manage the compliance program itself.

Hard Questions

What compliance teams always ask.

We have a vendor BAA with our cloud AI tool. +
A BAA addresses data handling liability between you and the vendor. It doesn't address whether using that tool is consistent with your state's emerging AI guidance, your market conduct exam posture, or your actuarial standards of practice obligations around model governance. Those are separate questions. Brian can walk you through the distinction in 20 minutes.
Our state hasn't adopted the NAIC model bulletin yet. +
Thirteen states have adopted or are actively considering NAIC AI guidance. The more relevant question is what your exam team will ask in the next 24 months — not just what's enforceable today. Examiners are asking about AI governance programs now, regardless of whether a formal bulletin is in effect.
We're too small to need this. +
The carriers most exposed are mid-market — large enough to have meaningful AI productivity opportunity, not large enough to have a 10-person internal AI governance team. If you have 50+ employees and are processing policyholder data, you have the exposure.
Why Brian

Regulatory knowledge from inside the industry

10+ years inside regulated industries. Not outside them.

Brian is a attorney and operator who understands what a state market conduct exam looks like from the inside, how NAIC guidance translates into state-level requirements, and what a defensible AI governance program needs to contain. He's not explaining compliance theory — he's built the frameworks. The 20-minute compliance risk assessment call isn't a sales call. It's Brian giving you his honest read on your specific exposure.

Schedule a Risk Assessment

Twenty minutes. Brian's honest read on your AI exposure under NAIC guidance.

Your state's regulatory environment, your specific data obligations, your current shadow AI exposure. No pitch. No commitment.

Schedule Your Compliance Risk Assessment →

brian@ark33.solutions